Model comparison
Olmo 3.1 32b Think vs Wizardlm 70b
Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 3.1 32b Think scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads 46.4 to 34.9.
Side by side
| Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 32.4 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.1 (#186), Wizardlm 70b: 30.9 (#280)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1292 | 1081 |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 24.1 (#151), Wizardlm 70b: 19.8 (#231)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1272 | 1079 |
Math Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 33.6 (#170), Wizardlm 70b: 29.7 (#216)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1305 | 1116 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.0 (#178), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1294 | — |
Multilingual Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.3 (#226), Wizardlm 70b: 29.8 (#260)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1210 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1241 | 1052 |
| LMArena German | 1260 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1193 | 1155 |
| LMArena French | 1262 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1288 | — |
Instruction Following Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.8 (#213), Wizardlm 70b: 56.5 (#268)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1246 | 1093 |
Long Context Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#190), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#258)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1272 | 1097 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.4 (#215), Wizardlm 70b: 34.9 (#264)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1271 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1226 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1252 | 1108 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 3.1 32b Think better than Wizardlm 70b?
Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Olmo 3.1 32b Think or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?
Olmo 3.1 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 3.1 32b Think and Wizardlm 70b share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.