Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Wizardlm 70b
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads 51.9 to 34.9.
- Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 32.4 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 32 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.4 (#181), Wizardlm 70b: 30.9 (#280)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 1081 |
| LiveBench Coding | 47.1% | — |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 21.2 (#203), Wizardlm 70b: 19.8 (#231)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1324 | 1079 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 50.1% | — |
| DTBench | 52.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65.5% | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | — |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.8 (#192), Wizardlm 70b: 29.7 (#216)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1309 | 1116 |
| Omni-MATH | 37.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 58.1% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.6 (#185), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 72% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1305 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 30.6 (#103), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1100 | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.2 (#156), Wizardlm 70b: 29.8 (#260)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1323 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1339 | 1052 |
| LMArena German | 1306 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1328 | 1155 |
| LMArena French | 1346 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1302 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1325 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1313 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.6 (#158), Wizardlm 70b: 56.5 (#268)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1305 | 1093 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 78.3% | — |
| IFEval | 82.4% | — |
Long Context Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#155), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#258)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1321 | 1097 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.9 (#172), Wizardlm 70b: 34.9 (#264)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1330 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1307 | 1108 |
| WildBench | 79% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 34.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Wizardlm 70b?
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Wizardlm 70b share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.