Model comparison
GPT-5-Codex vs Wizardlm 70b
GPT-5-Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-5-Codex leads 41.9 to 30.9.
- Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5-Codex | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 32.4 |
| Released | 2025-09-15 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 400K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.25 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5-Codex leads
GPT-5-Codex: 41.9 (#100), Wizardlm 70b: 30.9 (#280)
| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 54.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1081 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5-Codex: 30.8 (#66), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 44.3% | — |
Reasoning GPT-5-Codex leads
GPT-5-Codex: 30.0 (#80), Wizardlm 70b: 19.8 (#231)
| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 70.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1079 |
Math Not comparable
GPT-5-Codex: —, Wizardlm 70b: 29.7 (#216)
| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1116 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5-Codex: —, Wizardlm 70b: 29.8 (#260)
| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1052 |
| LMArena German | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1155 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5-Codex: —, Wizardlm 70b: 56.5 (#268)
| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1093 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5-Codex: —, Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#258)
| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1097 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5-Codex: —, Wizardlm 70b: 34.9 (#264)
| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1108 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5-Codex better than Wizardlm 70b?
GPT-5-Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-5-Codex or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?
GPT-5-Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5-Codex and Wizardlm 70b share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5-Codex has 3 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.