Model comparison
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct vs Yi-34B
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-34B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 36.1 to 7.5.
Side by side
| Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Yi-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 39.4 | 27.8 |
| Released | — | 2023-11-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157), Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | 1112 |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1322 | 1104 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 71.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 117.39 |
Math Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1305 | 1114 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 5.1% |
| GSM8K | — | 76% |
Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1308 | 1061 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 14.7% |
| MMLU | — | 76.3% |
Multilingual Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191), Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1275 | 1079 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1304 | 1176 |
| LMArena French | 1328 | 1081 |
| LMArena German | 1282 | 1042 |
| LMArena Korean | 1206 | 959 |
| LMArena Russian | 1268 | 1050 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1336 | 1070 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 993 |
Instruction Following Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187), Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1299 | 1091 |
Long Context Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1312 | 1094 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185), Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | 1129 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | 1108 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1309 | 1113 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better than Yi-34B?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct or Yi-34B better for coding?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct and Yi-34B share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.