Noometry

Model comparison

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct vs Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)

39.4

Rank #168 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct Microsoft

27.9

Rank #328 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 50.2 to 27.6.

Side by side

Olmo 3.1 32b InstructPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
ProviderAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)Microsoft
Noometry Index39.427.9
Released—2024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1635

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#323)

BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Coding13471093
LiveBench Coding—15.5%
HumanEval+—59.1%
MBPP+—54.2%

Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 14.1 (#328)

BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13221072
Chess Puzzles—0%
LiveBench Reasoning—26.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—34.7%
Adversarial NLI—52.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
HellaSwag—76.7%
LiveBench—22.4%
WinoGrande—70.8%

Math Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#257)

BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Math13051111
LiveBench Math—15.7%

Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 28.5 (#246)

BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Expert13081045
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.9%
MMLU—68.8%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—64%

Multilingual Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.3 (#280)

BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English12751021
LMArena Chinese13041021
LMArena French13281076
LMArena German12821044
LMArena Korean1206905
LMArena Russian12681022
LMArena Spanish13361085
LMArena Japanese—935

Instruction Following Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 47.7 (#303)

BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12991053
LiveBench Instruction Following—39.1%

Long Context Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#276)

BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13121044

Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.6 (#300)

BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Text13111073
LMArena Creative Writing12641037
LMArena Multi-Turn13091018
LiveBench Language—9.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better than Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct or Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 26.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper