Model comparison
Llama 4 Scout vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 4 Scout scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 38.9 to 19.9.
Side by side
| Llama 4 Scout | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 27.4 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2025-04-05 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Results tracked | 43 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Llama 4 Scout: 19.9 (#334), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154)
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1286 | 1346 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 9.1% | — |
| SciCode | 17% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 43.1% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 4 Scout: 24.4 (#109), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 28.1% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Llama 4 Scout: 9.2 (#339), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131)
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1266 | 1322 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 36.9% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 0.5% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 57.9% | — |
| LMCA | 12% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 129.64 | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.5 | — |
Math Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Llama 4 Scout: 18.4 (#280), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169)
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1286 | 1305 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 37.3% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 62.3% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 0% | — |
Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Llama 4 Scout: 31.8 (#208), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175)
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1236 | 1307 |
| GPQA Diamond | 51.8% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 74.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 4 Scout: 31.6 (#98), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1118 | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 34.2% | — |
Multilingual Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Llama 4 Scout: 41.3 (#207), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185)
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1253 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1256 | 1304 |
| LMArena French | 1283 | 1328 |
| LMArena German | 1274 | 1283 |
| LMArena Korean | 1207 | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | 1263 | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1277 | 1337 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1209 | — |
Instruction Following Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Llama 4 Scout: 66.0 (#212), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182)
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1248 | 1298 |
| IFEval | 81.8% | — |
Long Context Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Llama 4 Scout: 27.5 (#289), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161)
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1265 | 1312 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 36% | — |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Llama 4 Scout: 37.1 (#256), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179)
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1279 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1249 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1281 | 1309 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 783 | — |
| WildBench | 78% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 4 Scout better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 4 Scout or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 19.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 4 Scout and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 4 Scout has 43 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.