Model comparison
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 32.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher in 8 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 33.6 to 13.3.
Side by side
| Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 32.6 |
| Released | — | 2024-11-21 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 35.4 (#211)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1346 | 1236 |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 22.9 (#172)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1322 | 1220 |
Math Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 13.3 (#297)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1305 | 1242 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 4.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 42.7% |
Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.1 (#257)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1307 | — |
Multilingual Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 40.1 (#217)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1275 | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1304 | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | 1268 | 1246 |
| LMArena French | 1328 | — |
| LMArena German | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1206 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1337 | — |
Instruction Following Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 65.0 (#222)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1298 | 1233 |
Long Context Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#217)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1312 | 1224 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.8 (#218)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | 1256 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | 1231 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1309 | 1252 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 32.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 35.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.