Model comparison
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 26.4 to 22.4.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 33.4 | 39.4 |
| Released | 2025-12-02 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 42.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1347 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | 2% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1322 |
Math Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1308 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1304 |
| LMArena French | — | 1328 |
| LMArena German | — | 1282 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1336 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1299 |
Long Context Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1312 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1309 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 39.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Nova 2.0 Pro Preview and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.