Model comparison

GLM-4.5-Air vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B

GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.5-Air Z.ai (Zhipu)

38.9

Rank #177 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5-Air scores higher in 7 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GLM-4.5-Air leads 36.2 to 14.2.

Side by side

GLM-4.5-Air and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B specifications
GLM-4.5-AirTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index38.933.0
Released2025-07-202024-11-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output98K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.20—
Output $ / M tokens$1.10—
Results tracked2714

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 33.3 (#259), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 36.0 (#214)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Coding13971235
GSO2.9%—

Reasoning Too close to call

GLM-4.5-Air: 24.1 (#166), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 23.9 (#169)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Hard Prompts13791220
Kagi LLM Benchmark43%—
ForecastBench59.2—

Math GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 36.2 (#170), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 14.2 (#303)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Math13961242
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—4.4%
Omni-MATH39.1%—
MATH Level 5—42.7%

Knowledge GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 35.0 (#191), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.0 (#264)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
GPQA Diamond—46.3%
Humanity's Last Exam8.1%—
MMLU-Pro76.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.3%—
GPQA (HELM)59.4%—
LMArena Expert1370—

Multilingual GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 49.1 (#135), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 39.9 (#222)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Non-English13661236
LMArena Chinese14261249
LMArena Russian13731246
LMArena French1399—
LMArena German1377—
LMArena Japanese1348—
LMArena Korean1308—
LMArena Spanish1386—

Instruction Following GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 69.6 (#171), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 64.8 (#227)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Instruction Following13541233
IFEval81.2%—

Long Context GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 41.6 (#135), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#222)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Longer Query13661224

Writing & Preference GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 55.9 (#139), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.6 (#223)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Text13841256
LMArena Creative Writing13431231
LMArena Multi-Turn13711252
WildBench78.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-4.5-Air better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?

GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-4.5-Air or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?

Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.0 versus 33.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5-Air and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5-Air has 27 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper