Model comparison
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct vs Qwen1.5-14B
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-14B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 50.4 to 33.7.
Side by side
| Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen1.5-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 32.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154), Qwen1.5-14B: 32.5 (#259)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1346 | 1138 |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131), Qwen1.5-14B: 20.5 (#217)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1322 | 1113 |
Math Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169), Qwen1.5-14B: 29.9 (#214)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1305 | 1125 |
Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175), Qwen1.5-14B: 29.3 (#230)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1307 | 1094 |
| MMLU | — | 68.6% |
Multilingual Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185), Qwen1.5-14B: 30.8 (#257)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1275 | 1095 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1304 | 1147 |
| LMArena French | 1328 | 1115 |
| LMArena German | 1283 | 1043 |
| LMArena Russian | 1268 | 1046 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1337 | 1085 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1019 |
| LMArena Korean | 1206 | — |
Instruction Following Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182), Qwen1.5-14B: 57.1 (#266)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1298 | 1102 |
Long Context Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#252)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1312 | 1113 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#270)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | 1128 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1309 | 1110 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better than Qwen1.5-14B?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct or Qwen1.5-14B better for coding?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 32.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct and Qwen1.5-14B share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-14B has 17.