Model comparison
Command R+ vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 1 category and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 26.4 to 9.2.
Side by side
| Command R+ | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 39.4 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 34 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 1347 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1322 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |
Math Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1305 |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | 1308 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |
Multilingual Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | 1304 |
| LMArena French | 1209 | 1328 |
| LMArena German | 1216 | 1282 |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | 1336 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
Instruction Following Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1299 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |
Long Context Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | 1312 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 1309 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R+ better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command R+ or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.