Model comparison

gpt-oss-20b vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

gpt-oss-20b OpenAI

32.5

Rank #255 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. gpt-oss-20b scores higher in 1 category and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 50.2 to 35.5.

Side by side

gpt-oss-20b and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct specifications
gpt-oss-20bOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
ProviderOpenAIAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index32.539.4
Released2025-08-05—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output16K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.018—
Output $ / M tokens$0.09—
Results tracked3416

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

gpt-oss-20b: 37.6 (#192), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding13061347
SciCode34.4%—
WeirdML40.9%—
ALE-Bench566.05—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

gpt-oss-20b: 9.3 (#154), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
Terminal-Bench3.4%—

Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

gpt-oss-20b: 19.3 (#261), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts12741322
Kagi LLM Benchmark53.2%—
CritPt1.4%—
Chess Puzzles4%—
DTBench68%—
LMCA14.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index137.82—

Math gpt-oss-20b leads

gpt-oss-20b: 39.4 (#103), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)

Math benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Math13171305
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202565.3%—
Omni-MATH56.5%—

Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

gpt-oss-20b: 34.6 (#195), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Expert12581308
GPQA Diamond60.8%—
MMLU-Pro74%—
GPQA (HELM)59.4%—

Multilingual Too close to call

gpt-oss-20b: 42.2 (#197), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English12681275
LMArena Chinese13141304
LMArena German12551282
LMArena Korean12361206
LMArena Russian12781268
LMArena Spanish12671336
LMArena French—1328
LMArena Japanese1244—

Instruction Following Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

gpt-oss-20b: 61.8 (#240), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12361299
IFEval73.2%—

Long Context Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

gpt-oss-20b: 37.9 (#209), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query12501312

Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

gpt-oss-20b: 35.5 (#265), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Text12871311
LMArena Creative Writing12011264
LMArena Multi-Turn12681309
EQ-Bench Creative Writing666—
WildBench73.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is gpt-oss-20b better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is gpt-oss-20b or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do gpt-oss-20b and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. gpt-oss-20b has 34 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper