Model comparison

Granite 4.2 3b vs Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct

Granite 4.2 3b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 3b IBM

39.4

Rank #169 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct Microsoft

27.9

Rank #328 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 3b scores higher in 7 categories and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Granite 4.2 3b leads 47.2 to 27.6.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 3b and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct specifications
Granite 4.2 3bPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
ProviderIBMMicrosoft
Noometry Index39.427.9
Released—2024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1135

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 40.0 (#151), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#323)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Coding13611093
LiveBench Coding—15.5%
HumanEval+—59.1%
MBPP+—54.2%

Reasoning Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 26.0 (#138), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 14.1 (#328)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13061072
Chess Puzzles—0%
LiveBench Reasoning—26.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—34.7%
Adversarial NLI—52.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
HellaSwag—76.7%
LiveBench—22.4%
WinoGrande—70.8%

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#257)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LiveBench Math—15.7%
LMArena Math—1111

Knowledge Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 36.3 (#171), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 28.5 (#246)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Expert13151045
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.9%
MMLU—68.8%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—64%

Multilingual Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 42.1 (#198), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.3 (#280)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English12681021
LMArena Chinese12691021
LMArena Russian12491022
LMArena French—1076
LMArena German—1044
LMArena Japanese—935
LMArena Korean—905
LMArena Spanish—1085

Instruction Following Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 67.1 (#200), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 47.7 (#303)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12731053
LiveBench Instruction Following—39.1%

Long Context Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 39.2 (#185), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#276)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query12911044

Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 47.2 (#212), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.6 (#300)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Text12931073
LMArena Creative Writing12051037
LMArena Multi-Turn12901018
LiveBench Language—9.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 3b better than Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct?

Granite 4.2 3b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 3b or Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better for coding?

Granite 4.2 3b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 26.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 3b and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 3b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper