Model comparison
Kimi K2.5 vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Kimi K2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.5 leads 53.6 to 18.0.
Side by side
| Kimi K2.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 47.8 | 29.2 |
| Released | 2026-01-27 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 262K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.45 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.25 | — |
| Results tracked | 51 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.5 leads
Kimi K2.5: 48.7 (#48), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 73.8% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 70.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1436 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 67.3% | — |
| SciCode | 49% | — |
| WeirdML | 45.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1474 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 821.65 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Kimi K2.5: 34.0 (#44), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 43.2% | — |
| OSWorld | 63.3% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 1,198 | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2.5 leads
Kimi K2.5: 31.2 (#74), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 11.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 46.8% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 78.5% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 69.9% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 65.3% | — |
| CritPt | 3.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 12% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 3.4% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 69.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1454 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 148.05 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math Kimi K2.5 leads
Kimi K2.5: 50.3 (#46), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 62.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 92.2% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1470 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 27.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
Knowledge Kimi K2.5 leads
Kimi K2.5: 53.6 (#52), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 87.6% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 24.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 34.3% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 14.2% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1466 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Kimi K2.5: 40.4 (#37), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1269 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1430 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Kimi K2.5: 54.1 (#50), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1433 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | — |
| LMArena French | 1454 | — |
| LMArena German | 1441 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1436 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1450 | — |
Instruction Following Kimi K2.5 leads
Kimi K2.5: 75.5 (#60), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1431 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Kimi K2.5: 52.1 (#7), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 86.1% | — |
| CL-bench | 19.3% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 13.2% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1445 | — |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 leads
Kimi K2.5: 65.3 (#51), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1423 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1579 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1444 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2.5 better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
Kimi K2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2.5 or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
Kimi K2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.7 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 has 51 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.