Model comparison

Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct vs Step 5 Preview

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Step 5 Preview StepFun

47.9

Rank #58 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Step 5 Preview in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Step 5 Preview leads 40.0 to 20.7.
  • Step 5 Preview is cheaper at $1 / $2.70 per million input/output tokens, against $2.80 / $8.40 for Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct.
  • Step 5 Preview accepts more context: 1.02M tokens versus 131K.
  • Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct and Step 5 Preview specifications
Qwen2.5-VL 72B InstructStep 5 Preview
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)StepFun
Noometry Index29.947.9
Released2024-092026-09-16
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window131K1.02M
Max output8K66K
Input $ / M tokens$2.80$1
Output $ / M tokens$8.40$2.70
Results tracked618

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —, Step 5 Preview: 51.8 (#36)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5-VL 72B InstructStep 5 Preview
LMArena WebDev—1564
SciCode—58.9%
LMArena Coding—1480

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 18.6 (#144), Step 5 Preview: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5-VL 72B InstructStep 5 Preview
OSWorld5%—

Reasoning Step 5 Preview leads

Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 20.7 (#233), Step 5 Preview: 40.0 (#57)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5-VL 72B InstructStep 5 Preview
Kagi LLM Benchmark36%—
CritPt—20.9%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1465

Math Not comparable

Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —, Step 5 Preview: 46.1 (#72)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5-VL 72B InstructStep 5 Preview
ProofBench—42%
LMArena Math—1470

Knowledge Not comparable

Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —, Step 5 Preview: 41.2 (#112)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5-VL 72B InstructStep 5 Preview
LMArena Expert—1470

Multimodal Step 5 Preview leads

Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 33.5 (#97), Step 5 Preview: 41.0 (#41)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5-VL 72B InstructStep 5 Preview
LMArena Vision11071267
Video-MME73.5%—
GeoBench62%—
SpatialViz-Bench33.3%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —, Step 5 Preview: 53.8 (#54)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5-VL 72B InstructStep 5 Preview
LMArena Non-English—1432
LMArena Chinese—1519
LMArena Russian—1436
LMArena Spanish—1439

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —, Step 5 Preview: 76.0 (#50)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5-VL 72B InstructStep 5 Preview
LMArena Instruction Following—1444

Long Context Not comparable

Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —, Step 5 Preview: 44.5 (#64)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5-VL 72B InstructStep 5 Preview
LMArena Longer Query—1455

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —, Step 5 Preview: 62.8 (#71)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5-VL 72B InstructStep 5 Preview
LMArena Text—1442
LMArena Creative Writing—1410
LMArena Multi-Turn—1447

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct better than Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct or Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview is cheaper. It lists at $1 per million input tokens and $2.70 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct lists at $2.80 and $8.40.

Which has the bigger context window?

Step 5 Preview does, with 1.02M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct and Step 5 Preview share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has 6 scored results on Noometry and Step 5 Preview has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper