Model comparison
MiniMax M1 vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MiniMax
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax M1 leads 35.7 to 18.0.
Side by side
| MiniMax M1 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 39.7 | 29.2 |
| Released | 2025-06-13 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 40K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax M1 leads
MiniMax M1: 39.2 (#149), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309)
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1359 | — |
Reasoning MiniMax M1 leads
MiniMax M1: 25.8 (#125), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1340 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math MiniMax M1 leads
MiniMax M1: 34.8 (#152), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270)
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1360 | — |
Knowledge MiniMax M1 leads
MiniMax M1: 35.7 (#168), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278)
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1316 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiniMax M1: 46.0 (#157), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1320 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1361 | — |
| LMArena French | 1369 | — |
| LMArena German | 1350 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1220 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1263 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1330 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1354 | — |
Instruction Following MiniMax M1 leads
MiniMax M1: 69.5 (#169), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243)
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1312 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#136), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 69.4% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1326 | — |
Writing & Preference MiniMax M1 leads
MiniMax M1: 53.3 (#155), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226)
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1343 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1298 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1335 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiniMax M1 better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiniMax M1 or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
MiniMax M1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.2 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiniMax M1 and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax M1 has 18 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.