Model comparison

Longcat Flash Chat vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Longcat Flash Chat Meituan

42.1

Rank #120 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 40.6 to 18.3.

Side by side

Longcat Flash Chat and OLMo 2 Furious 13B specifications
Longcat Flash ChatOLMo 2 Furious 13B
ProviderMeituanAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index42.129.7
Released—2024-12-31
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1912

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LiveBench Coding—10.4%
LMArena Coding1471—

Reasoning Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatOLMo 2 Furious 13B
Kagi LLM Benchmark43.9%—
NYT Connections (extended)17.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning—16.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1440—
LiveBench Data Analysis—20.6%
LiveBench—22.1%

Math Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatOLMo 2 Furious 13B
Omni-MATH—15.6%
LiveBench Math—13.6%
LMArena Math1442—

Knowledge Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatOLMo 2 Furious 13B
MMLU-Pro—31%
GPQA (HELM)—31.6%
LMArena Expert1454—

Multilingual Not comparable

Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Non-English1404—
LMArena Chinese1465—
LMArena French1456—
LMArena German1408—
LMArena Japanese1373—
LMArena Korean1371—
LMArena Russian1395—
LMArena Spanish1445—

Instruction Following Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LiveBench Instruction Following—60.6%
IFEval—73%
LMArena Instruction Following1411—

Long Context Not comparable

Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Longer Query1425—

Writing & Preference Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Text1427—
LMArena Creative Writing1388—
WildBench—68.9%
LMArena Multi-Turn1418—
LiveBench Language—11.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is Longcat Flash Chat better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Longcat Flash Chat or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?

Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Longcat Flash Chat and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Longcat Flash Chat has 19 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper