Model comparison

Llama 3.1-70B vs Solar Pro4

Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.1-70B Meta

29.6

Rank #308 Confirmed

Solar Pro4 Upstage

42.1

Rank #121 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1-70B scores higher in 0 categories and Solar Pro4 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Solar Pro4 leads 38.8 to 13.5.
  • Llama 3.1-70B is cheaper at $0.40 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for Solar Pro4.
  • Solar Pro4 accepts more context: 524K tokens versus 128K.
  • Llama 3.1-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama 3.1-70B and Solar Pro4 specifications
Llama 3.1-70BSolar Pro4
ProviderMetaUpstage
Noometry Index29.642.1
Released2024-07-232026-08-06
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K524K
Max output4K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.40$0.30
Output $ / M tokens$0.40$1.20
Results tracked3518

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Solar Pro4 leads

Llama 3.1-70B: 30.3 (#296), Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-70BSolar Pro4
LMArena Coding12601437
LMArena WebDev—1371
WeirdML9%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46.1%—
BigCodeBench Complete54.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3.1-70B: 25.1 (#112), Solar Pro4: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-70BSolar Pro4
TheAgentCompany6.9%—
BALROG27.9%—

Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads

Llama 3.1-70B: 21.6 (#220), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-70BSolar Pro4
LMArena Hard Prompts12411399
DTBench60%—
LMCA14.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index125.92—

Math Solar Pro4 leads

Llama 3.1-70B: 13.5 (#304), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-70BSolar Pro4
LMArena Math12521416
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20253.6%—
Omni-MATH21%—
MATH Level 536.7%—

Knowledge Solar Pro4 leads

Llama 3.1-70B: 24.2 (#269), Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-70BSolar Pro4
LMArena Expert12091427
GPQA Diamond44.2%—
MMLU-Pro65.3%—
GPQA (HELM)42.6%—
MMLU80.1%—

Multilingual Solar Pro4 leads

Llama 3.1-70B: 38.8 (#225), Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-70BSolar Pro4
LMArena Non-English12191361
LMArena Chinese12151415
LMArena French12611397
LMArena German12221364
LMArena Japanese11321309
LMArena Korean11401382
LMArena Russian12341360
LMArena Spanish12531401

Instruction Following Solar Pro4 leads

Llama 3.1-70B: 65.3 (#223), Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-70BSolar Pro4
LMArena Instruction Following12311377
IFEval82.1%—

Long Context Solar Pro4 leads

Llama 3.1-70B: 37.6 (#214), Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-70BSolar Pro4
LMArena Longer Query12411381

Writing & Preference Solar Pro4 leads

Llama 3.1-70B: 35.4 (#267), Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-70BSolar Pro4
LMArena Text12611386
LMArena Creative Writing12321316
LMArena Multi-Turn12561385
EQ-Bench Creative Writing784—
WildBench75.8%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.1-70B better than Solar Pro4?

Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1-70B or Solar Pro4?

Llama 3.1-70B is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Solar Pro4 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.

Is Llama 3.1-70B or Solar Pro4 better for coding?

Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 30.3 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Solar Pro4 does, with 524K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1-70B and Solar Pro4 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1-70B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper