Noometry

Model comparison

OLMo 2 Furious 13B vs Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

OLMo 2 Furious 13B Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)

29.7

Rank #304 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

51.5

Rank #42 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 61.6 to 18.3.
  • OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

OLMo 2 Furious 13BQwen3.7 Max
ProviderAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.751.5
Released2024-12-312026-05-19
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked1233

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.7 Max leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313), Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45)

BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BQwen3.7 Max
SWE-bench Verified—77.3%
LMArena WebDev—1515
SciCode—48.8%
LiveBench Coding10.4%—
LMArena Coding—1498
ALE-Bench—1,189

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135)

BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BQwen3.7 Max
GBAEval—0.4%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Max leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314), Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38)

BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BQwen3.7 Max
SimpleBench—70.4%
NYT Connections (extended)—85.1%
CritPt—13.4%
Chess Puzzles—19%
EBR-Bench—9.5%
LiveBench Reasoning16.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1483
Mystery Game Puzzles—32%
DTBench—92.3%
LiveBench Data Analysis20.6%—
LMCA—44%
Epoch Capabilities Index—153.68
LiveBench22.1%—

Math Qwen3.7 Max leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273), Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32)

BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BQwen3.7 Max
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—64.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—34.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—95.6%
ProofBench—26%
Omni-MATH15.6%—
LiveBench Math13.6%—
LMArena Math—1490

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Max leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283), Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28)

BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BQwen3.7 Max
GPQA Diamond—90.9%
SimpleQA Verified—55.8%
MMLU-Pro31%—
GPQA (HELM)31.6%—
LMArena Expert—1488

Multilingual Not comparable

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15)

BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Non-English—1474
LMArena Chinese—1530
LMArena Russian—1484

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Max leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248), Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38)

BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BQwen3.7 Max
LiveBench Instruction Following60.6%—
IFEval73%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1460

Long Context Not comparable

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40)

BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Longer Query—1482

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Max leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230), Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54)

BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Text—1476
LMArena Creative Writing—1449
WildBench68.9%—
EQ-Bench 4—1110
LMArena Multi-Turn—1481
LiveBench Language11.2%—

Frequently asked questions

Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.4 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do OLMo 2 Furious 13B and Qwen3.7 Max share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper