Noometry

Model comparison

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct vs Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.4 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct Microsoft

29.1

Rank #303 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

51.4

Rank #35 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Max in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 65.2 to 27.3.
  • Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Phi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen3.7 Max
ProviderMicrosoftAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.151.4
Released2024-04-232026-05-19
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked1933

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.7 Max leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.3 (#307), Qwen3.7 Max: 50.2 (#43)

BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Coding10401498
SWE-bench Verified—77.3%
LMArena WebDev—1515
SciCode—48.8%
BigCodeBench Instruct29.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete40.6%—
ALE-Bench—1,189

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 21.8 (#129)

BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen3.7 Max
GBAEval—0.4%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Max leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 18.7 (#254), Qwen3.7 Max: 48.4 (#36)

BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts10281483
SimpleBench—70.4%
NYT Connections (extended)—85.1%
CritPt—13.4%
Chess Puzzles—19%
EBR-Bench—9.5%
Mystery Game Puzzles—32%
DTBench—92.3%
LMCA—44%
Epoch Capabilities Index—153.74

Math Qwen3.7 Max leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 29.2 (#220), Qwen3.7 Max: 62.3 (#26)

BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Math10891488
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—64.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—34.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—95.6%
ProofBench—26%

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Max leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.3 (#251), Qwen3.7 Max: 61.7 (#24)

BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Expert9841488
GPQA Diamond—90.9%
SimpleQA Verified—55.8%

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Max leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.4 (#280), Qwen3.7 Max: 57.1 (#13)

BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Non-English10001475
LMArena Chinese10161533
LMArena Russian10041482
LMArena French1038—
LMArena German1006—
LMArena Japanese899—
LMArena Korean856—
LMArena Spanish1058—

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Max leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 52.1 (#289), Qwen3.7 Max: 76.9 (#34)

BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Instruction Following10231460

Long Context Qwen3.7 Max leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.3 (#284), Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#34)

BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Longer Query9961484

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Max leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.3 (#296), Qwen3.7 Max: 65.2 (#52)

BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Text10501476
LMArena Creative Writing10241450
LMArena Multi-Turn9891482
EQ-Bench 4—1110

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.4 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.2 versus 28.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct and Qwen3.7 Max share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper