Model comparison
Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Gemini 3 Flash Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads 58.8 to 18.3.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 3 Flash Preview | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 52.3 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2025-12-17 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3 | — |
| Results tracked | 59 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 50.9 (#42), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 75.4% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 75.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1439 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 72.7% | — |
| GSO | 9.8% | — |
| WeirdML | 61.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1460 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,367 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 38.7 (#29), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 64.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Airline | 82.5% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 27.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Retail | 76.8% | — |
| τ²-bench Telecom | 91.2% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 49.8% | — |
| BALROG | 48.1% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1198 | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 3,635 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 49.2 (#37), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 33.6% | — |
| SimpleBench | 61.1% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 83.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 84.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 40% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1465 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 26% | — |
| DTBench | 89.1% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LMCA | 43.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 151.8 | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.5 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 51.7 (#55), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 51.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 17.1% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 67.6% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 15% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1473 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 35.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 58.8 (#33), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 66.8% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 13.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1462 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 45.5 (#16), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1285 | — |
| GeoBench | 88% | — |
| VPCT | 72.6% | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 0% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1413 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 55.7 (#27), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1458 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1511 | — |
| LMArena French | 1477 | — |
| LMArena German | 1497 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1489 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1443 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1480 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1469 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 75.7 (#56), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1437 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 44.4 (#67), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1452 | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 65.5 (#45), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1466 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1457 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3 Flash Preview better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
Gemini 3 Flash Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 3 Flash Preview or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
Gemini 3 Flash Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.9 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3 Flash Preview and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3 Flash Preview has 59 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.