Model comparison
o3-pro vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where o3-pro leads 55.5 to 28.6.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| o3-pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2025-06-10 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 100K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $20 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $80 | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o3-pro leads
o3-pro: 55.5 (#24), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 84.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 58.2% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
Reasoning o3-pro leads
o3-pro: 23.8 (#171), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.9% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 72.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 59.3% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| DTBench | 86.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LMCA | 38.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 147.42 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math Not comparable
o3-pro: —, OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
Knowledge o3-pro leads
o3-pro: 29.5 (#238), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| Confabulations | 14.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 23.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
Instruction Following Not comparable
o3-pro: —, OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
Long Context Not comparable
o3-pro: 72.2 (#1), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | o3-pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 97.2% | — |
Writing & Preference o3-pro leads
o3-pro: 57.1 (#133), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 84.4% | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is o3-pro better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is o3-pro or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
o3-pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do o3-pro and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. o3-pro has 12 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.