Model comparison
OLMo 2 Furious 13B vs Qwen Plus
Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen Plus leads 28.4 to 15.5.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 37.1 |
| Released | 2024-12-31 | 2024-01-25 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen Plus leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313), Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 10.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1328 |
Reasoning Qwen Plus leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314), Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 16.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1317 |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 20.6% | — |
| LMCA | — | 24% |
| LiveBench | 22.1% | — |
Math Too close to call
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273), Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| Omni-MATH | 15.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 13.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1326 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge Qwen Plus leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283), Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | 31% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 31.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1328 |
Multilingual Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1323 |
Instruction Following Qwen Plus leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248), Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 60.6% | — |
| IFEval | 73% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1303 |
Long Context Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1324 |
Writing & Preference Qwen Plus leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230), Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1293 |
| WildBench | 68.9% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1336 |
| LiveBench Language | 11.2% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B better than Qwen Plus?
Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B or Qwen Plus better for coding?
Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do OLMo 2 Furious 13B and Qwen Plus share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.