Noometry

Model comparison

GPT-4.5 vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B

GPT-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4.5 OpenAI

37.2

Rank #208 Confirmed

OLMo 2 Furious 13B Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)

29.7

Rank #304 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.5 scores higher in 5 categories and OLMo 2 Furious 13B in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-4.5 leads 32.5 to 18.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Coding: 75.2% for GPT-4.5 and 10.4% for OLMo 2 Furious 13B.
  • OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-4.5OLMo 2 Furious 13B
ProviderOpenAIAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index37.229.7
Released2025-02-272024-12-31
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4212

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-4.5 leads

GPT-4.5: 42.2 (#109), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5OLMo 2 Furious 13B
LiveBench Coding75.2%10.4%
Aider Polyglot44.9%—
WeirdML39.4%—
LMArena Coding1396—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4.5: 27.9 (#97), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

BenchmarkGPT-4.5OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Cybench17.5%—

Reasoning OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads

GPT-4.5: 13.9 (#330), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5OLMo 2 Furious 13B
LiveBench Reasoning71.1%16.3%
LiveBench Data Analysis64.3%20.6%
LiveBench69%22.1%
ARC-AGI-20.8%—
SimpleBench34.5%—
ARC-AGI-110.3%—
EnigmaEval3.2%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1403—
Epoch Capabilities Index136.74—
ForecastBench61.7—

Math GPT-4.5 leads

GPT-4.5: 32.6 (#211), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5OLMo 2 Furious 13B
LiveBench Math69.3%13.6%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202537.8%—
Omni-MATH—15.6%
LMArena Math1412—
MATH Level 578.6%—

Knowledge GPT-4.5 leads

GPT-4.5: 32.5 (#211), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5OLMo 2 Furious 13B
GPQA Diamond68.7%—
Humanity's Last Exam5.4%—
MMLU-Pro—31%
Confabulations13.6%—
GPQA (HELM)—31.6%
LMArena Expert1394—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-4.5: 37.6 (#71), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

BenchmarkGPT-4.5OLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Vision1195—
VPCT45%—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-4.5: 52.5 (#83), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

BenchmarkGPT-4.5OLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Non-English1413—
LMArena Chinese1421—
LMArena French1418—
LMArena German1457—
LMArena Japanese1416—
LMArena Korean1392—
LMArena Russian1419—

Instruction Following GPT-4.5 leads

GPT-4.5: 72.6 (#134), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5OLMo 2 Furious 13B
LiveBench Instruction Following72.3%60.6%
IFEval—73%
LMArena Instruction Following1404—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-4.5: 40.4 (#155), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

BenchmarkGPT-4.5OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Fiction.LiveBench63.9%—
LMArena Longer Query1406—

Writing & Preference GPT-4.5 leads

GPT-4.5: 56.9 (#134), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5OLMo 2 Furious 13B
LiveBench Language61.5%11.2%
LMArena Text1417—
LMArena Creative Writing1394—
Short-Story Creative Writing75.6%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1258—
WildBench—68.9%
LMArena Multi-Turn1444—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4.5 better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?

GPT-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-4.5 or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?

GPT-4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.2 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4.5 and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.5 has 42 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper