Model comparison
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct vs Qwen Plus
Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Qwen Plus in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen Plus leads 52.2 to 27.1.
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 37.1 |
| Released | 2024-04-23 | 2024-01-25 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen Plus leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312), Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1039 | 1328 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.6% | — |
Reasoning Qwen Plus leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256), Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1028 | 1317 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |
Math Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222), Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1089 | 1326 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge Too close to call
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254), Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 984 | 1328 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |
Multilingual Qwen Plus leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285), Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1016 | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | 899 | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | 1004 | 1323 |
| LMArena French | 1039 | — |
| LMArena German | 1006 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 856 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1059 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen Plus leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294), Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1023 | 1303 |
Long Context Qwen Plus leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289), Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 996 | 1324 |
Writing & Preference Qwen Plus leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301), Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1050 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 989 | 1336 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better than Qwen Plus?
Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct or Qwen Plus better for coding?
Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct and Qwen Plus share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.