Model comparison
OLMo 2 Furious 13B vs Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads 30.2 to 18.3.
Side by side
| OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 33.0 |
| Released | 2024-12-31 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.9 (#268)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 10.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1130 |
Reasoning Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 21.7 (#214)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 16.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1127 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 20.6% | — |
| LiveBench | 22.1% | — |
Math Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.4 (#202)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 15.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 13.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1173 |
Knowledge Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.2 (#229)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 31% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 31.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1108 |
Multilingual Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.6 (#263)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1094 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1108 |
| LMArena French | — | 1110 |
| LMArena German | — | 1101 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1042 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 954 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1145 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1095 |
Instruction Following OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.6 (#268)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 60.6% | — |
| IFEval | 73% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1113 |
Long Context Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.0 (#255)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1120 |
Writing & Preference OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.1 (#272)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1138 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1107 |
| WildBench | 68.9% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1088 |
| LiveBench Language | 11.2% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B better than Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct?
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B or Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better for coding?
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.9 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do OLMo 2 Furious 13B and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17.