Model comparison

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct Microsoft

33.0

Rank #250 Confirmed

Side by side

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct specifications
Phi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
ProviderMicrosoftAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index33.029.9
Released—2024-09
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$2.80
Output $ / M tokens—$8.40
Results tracked176

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.9 (#268), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
LMArena Coding1130—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 18.6 (#144)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
OSWorld—5%

Reasoning Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 21.7 (#214), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 20.7 (#233)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
Kagi LLM Benchmark—36%
LMArena Hard Prompts1127—

Math Not comparable

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.4 (#202), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
LMArena Math1173—

Knowledge Not comparable

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.2 (#229), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
LMArena Expert1108—

Multimodal Not comparable

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 33.5 (#97)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
LMArena Vision—1107
Video-MME—73.5%
GeoBench—62%
SpatialViz-Bench—33.3%

Multilingual Not comparable

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.6 (#263), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
LMArena Non-English1094—
LMArena Chinese1108—
LMArena French1110—
LMArena German1101—
LMArena Japanese1042—
LMArena Korean954—
LMArena Russian1145—
LMArena Spanish1095—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.6 (#268), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following1113—

Long Context Not comparable

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.0 (#255), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1120—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.1 (#272), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
LMArena Text1138—
LMArena Creative Writing1107—
LMArena Multi-Turn1088—

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better than Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper