Model comparison
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct vs Yi-Lightning
Yi-Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Yi-Lightning in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Yi-Lightning leads 35.4 to 19.5.
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Yi-Lightning | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 32.7 | 37.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-12-02 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227), Yi-Lightning: 27.4 (#320)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1210 | 1312 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 12.9% |
Reasoning Yi-Lightning leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175), Yi-Lightning: 25.9 (#139)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1208 | 1302 |
Math Yi-Lightning leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255), Yi-Lightning: 36.2 (#172)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1208 | 1300 |
| Omni-MATH | 16.1% | — |
Knowledge Yi-Lightning leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279), Yi-Lightning: 35.4 (#185)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 41.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 28.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1286 |
Multilingual Yi-Lightning leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248), Yi-Lightning: 42.2 (#196)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1160 | 1269 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1192 | 1320 |
| LMArena Russian | 1187 | 1255 |
| LMArena French | — | 1305 |
| LMArena German | — | 1267 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1228 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1192 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1315 |
Instruction Following Yi-Lightning leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244), Yi-Lightning: 67.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1186 | 1278 |
| IFEval | 78% | — |
Long Context Yi-Lightning leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234), Yi-Lightning: 39.4 (#181)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1194 | 1297 |
Writing & Preference Yi-Lightning leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236), Yi-Lightning: 50.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1218 | 1302 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1199 | 1280 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1221 | 1311 |
| WildBench | 73.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better than Yi-Lightning?
Yi-Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct or Yi-Lightning better for coding?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 27.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Yi-Lightning share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Yi-Lightning has 18.