Model comparison
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct vs Qwen Plus
Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Qwen Plus in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Qwen Plus leads 45.1 to 34.8.
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.7 | 37.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-01-25 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen Plus leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227), Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1210 | 1328 |
Reasoning Qwen Plus leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175), Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1208 | 1317 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |
Math Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255), Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1208 | 1326 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| Omni-MATH | 16.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge Qwen Plus leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279), Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | 41.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 28.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1328 |
Multilingual Qwen Plus leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248), Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1160 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1192 | 1347 |
| LMArena Russian | 1187 | 1323 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1251 |
Instruction Following Qwen Plus leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244), Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1186 | 1303 |
| IFEval | 78% | — |
Long Context Qwen Plus leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234), Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1194 | 1324 |
Writing & Preference Qwen Plus leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236), Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1218 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1199 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1221 | 1336 |
| WildBench | 73.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better than Qwen Plus?
Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct or Qwen Plus better for coding?
Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Qwen Plus share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.