Model comparison
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct vs Step 3.7 Flash
Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
StepFunSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Step 3.7 Flash leads 42.9 to 26.8.
Side by side
| Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Step 3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 32.7 | 37.3 |
| Released | — | 2026-05-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.18 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.11 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 3.7 Flash leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227), Step 3.7 Flash: 40.0 (#150)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 40% |
| LMArena Coding | 1210 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 694.12 |
Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175), Step 3.7 Flash: 21.6 (#219)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 39.7% |
| CritPt | — | 2.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1208 | — |
Math Step 3.7 Flash leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255), Step 3.7 Flash: 42.9 (#82)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 68.5% |
| Omni-MATH | 16.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1208 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 41.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 28.7% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1160 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1192 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1187 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 78% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1186 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1194 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1218 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1199 | — |
| WildBench | 73.4% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1221 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better than Step 3.7 Flash?
Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?
Step 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Step 3.7 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.