Model comparison
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher in 5 categories and OLMo 2 Furious 13B in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 23.6 to 15.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MMLU-Pro: 41.4% for Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and 31% for OLMo 2 Furious 13B.
Side by side
| Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 32.7 | 29.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1210 | — |
Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1208 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 16.1% | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1208 | — |
Knowledge Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 41.4% | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 28.7% | 31.6% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1160 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1192 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1187 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 78% | 73% |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1186 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1194 | — |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | 73.4% | 68.9% |
| LMArena Text | 1218 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1199 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1221 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.