Model comparison

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct vs Olmo 7b Instruct

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher in 5 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 42.1 to 25.8.

Side by side

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Olmo 7b Instruct specifications
Olmo 2 0325 32b InstructOlmo 7b Instruct
ProviderAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index32.730.3
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1610

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Coding12101016

Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts1208993

Math Olmo 7b Instruct leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Math12081018
Omni-MATH16.1%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructOlmo 7b Instruct
MMLU-Pro41.4%—
GPQA (HELM)28.7%—

Multilingual Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Non-English1160977
LMArena Chinese11921014
LMArena Russian1187947

Instruction Following Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following1186978
IFEval78%—

Long Context Not comparable

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1194—

Writing & Preference Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Text12181032
LMArena Creative Writing1199990
LMArena Multi-Turn12211007
WildBench73.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better than Olmo 7b Instruct?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Olmo 7b Instruct share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper