Model comparison
Magistral Small vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 22.6 to 6.9.
Side by side
| Magistral Small | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 29.9 | 32.2 |
| Released | 2025-06-10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 40K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 10 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Magistral Small leads
Magistral Small: 37.8 (#172), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 35.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1210 |
Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Magistral Small: 6.9 (#345), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 6.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 5% | — |
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1208 |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.19 | — |
Math Too close to call
Magistral Small: 24.9 (#253), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 30% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1208 |
Knowledge Magistral Small leads
Magistral Small: 30.9 (#215), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 56.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Magistral Small: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1187 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Magistral Small: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 78% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1186 |
Long Context Not comparable
Magistral Small: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1194 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Magistral Small: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1199 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1221 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Magistral Small better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Magistral Small or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?
Magistral Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Magistral Small and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Small has 10 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.