Model comparison
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct vs Qwen1.5-32B
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen1.5-32B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 42.1 to 34.2.
Side by side
| Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.7 | 30.5 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.7 (#282)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1210 | 1155 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.3% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 42% |
Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175), Qwen1.5-32B: 21.8 (#212)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1208 | 1130 |
Math Qwen1.5-32B leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255), Qwen1.5-32B: 33.0 (#207)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1208 | 1155 |
| Omni-MATH | 16.1% | — |
Knowledge Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279), Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#296)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 30.7% |
| MMLU-Pro | 41.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 28.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1126 |
| MMLU | — | 74.4% |
Multilingual Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1160 | 1106 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1192 | 1177 |
| LMArena Russian | 1187 | 1073 |
| LMArena French | — | 1101 |
| LMArena German | — | 1058 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1027 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1008 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1089 |
Instruction Following Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244), Qwen1.5-32B: 57.7 (#265)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1186 | 1116 |
| IFEval | 78% | — |
Long Context Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#246)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1194 | 1146 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.2 (#271)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1218 | 1137 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1199 | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1221 | 1140 |
| WildBench | 73.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better than Qwen1.5-32B?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct or Qwen1.5-32B better for coding?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Qwen1.5-32B share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.