Model comparison

Mistral vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Mistral AI

29.9

Rank #303 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in instruction following, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 61.5 to 52.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is IFEval: 56.8% for Mistral and 78% for Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct.
  • Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Mistral and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct specifications
MistralOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
ProviderMistral AIAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index29.932.7
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2216

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Mistral: 33.8 (#250), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding11621210

Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Mistral: 22.2 (#200), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts11491208

Math Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Mistral: 22.3 (#278), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Omni-MATH7.2%16.1%
LMArena Math11801208

Knowledge Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Mistral: 16.6 (#288), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
MMLU-Pro27.7%41.4%
GPQA (HELM)30.3%28.7%
LMArena Expert1125—

Multilingual Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Mistral: 32.8 (#254), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English11291160
LMArena Chinese11091192
LMArena Russian11681187
LMArena French1180—
LMArena German1155—
LMArena Japanese1013—
LMArena Korean1032—
LMArena Spanish1143—

Instruction Following Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Mistral: 52.6 (#288), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
IFEval56.8%78%
LMArena Instruction Following11521186

Long Context Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Mistral: 35.0 (#245), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query11531194

Writing & Preference Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Mistral: 37.0 (#260), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Text11651218
LMArena Creative Writing11581199
WildBench66%73.4%
LMArena Multi-Turn11471221

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Mistral or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mistral and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral has 22 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper