Model comparison

o3-pro vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

o3-pro OpenAI

42.9

Rank #105 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #72 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. o3-pro scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where o3-pro leads 72.2 to 44.5.
  • Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.60 per million input/output tokens, against $20 / $80 for o3-pro.
  • Qwen3.7 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 200K.

Side by side

o3-pro and Qwen3.7 Plus specifications
o3-proQwen3.7 Plus
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index42.945.3
Released2025-06-102026-06-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K1M
Max output100K131K
Input $ / M tokens$20$0.40
Output $ / M tokens$80$1.60
Results tracked1232

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o3-pro leads

o3-pro: 55.5 (#24), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmarko3-proQwen3.7 Plus
FrontierCode—10.2%
Aider Polyglot84.9%—
SciCode—45.5%
WeirdML58.2%—
LMArena Coding—1473

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

o3-pro: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmarko3-proQwen3.7 Plus
OSWorld 2.0—2.8%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads

o3-pro: 23.8 (#171), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmarko3-proQwen3.7 Plus
DTBench86.9%84%
LMCA38.5%37.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index147.42147.37
ARC-AGI-24.9%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark72.1%—
NYT Connections (extended)—74.8%
ARC-AGI-159.3%—
CritPt—9.1%
Chess Puzzles—24%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1460
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%

Math Not comparable

o3-pro: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

Math benchmarks
Benchmarko3-proQwen3.7 Plus
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—34.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.3%
LMArena Math—1466

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads

o3-pro: 29.5 (#238), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmarko3-proQwen3.7 Plus
GPQA Diamond—87.9%
Confabulations14.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate23.3%—
LMArena Expert—1467

Multimodal Not comparable

o3-pro: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

Multimodal benchmarks
Benchmarko3-proQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision—1279
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Not comparable

o3-pro: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmarko3-proQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Non-English—1445
LMArena Chinese—1510
LMArena French—1473
LMArena German—1471
LMArena Japanese—1413
LMArena Korean—1415
LMArena Russian—1457
LMArena Spanish—1457

Instruction Following Not comparable

o3-pro: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmarko3-proQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following—1440

Long Context o3-pro leads

o3-pro: 72.2 (#1), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmarko3-proQwen3.7 Plus
Fiction.LiveBench97.2%—
LMArena Longer Query—1455

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Plus leads

o3-pro: 57.1 (#133), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmarko3-proQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text—1455
LMArena Creative Writing—1439
Short-Story Creative Writing84.4%—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1460

Frequently asked questions

Is o3-pro better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, o3-pro or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; o3-pro lists at $20 and $80.

Is o3-pro or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

o3-pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks do o3-pro and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. o3-pro has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper