Model comparison
o3-pro vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in long context, where o3-pro leads 72.2 to 45.2.
Side by side
| o3-pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 45.3 |
| Released | 2025-06-10 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 100K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $20 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $80 | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o3-pro leads
o3-pro: 55.5 (#24), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 84.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 58.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1487 |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
o3-pro: 23.8 (#171), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.9% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 72.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 59.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1483 |
| DTBench | 86.9% | — |
| LMCA | 38.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 147.42 | — |
Math Not comparable
o3-pro: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1474 |
Knowledge Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
o3-pro: 29.5 (#238), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Confabulations | 14.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 23.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1489 |
Multilingual Not comparable
o3-pro: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1534 |
| LMArena French | — | 1484 |
| LMArena German | — | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1495 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1438 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1470 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
o3-pro: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1467 |
Long Context o3-pro leads
o3-pro: 72.2 (#1), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 97.2% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1476 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
o3-pro: 57.1 (#133), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1470 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1464 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 84.4% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1478 |
Frequently asked questions
Is o3-pro better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is o3-pro or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?
o3-pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 44.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do o3-pro and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. o3-pro has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.