Noometry

Model comparison

Qwen3.5 Plus vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.5 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

42.9

Rank #106 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #72 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.5 Plus scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 4 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 54.9 to 46.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 86.7% for Qwen3.5 Plus and 93.3% for Qwen3.7 Plus.
  • Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $2.40 for Qwen3.5 Plus.

Side by side

Qwen3.5 PlusQwen3.7 Plus
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index42.945.3
Released2026-02-162026-06-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M1M
Max output66K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.40$0.40
Output $ / M tokens$2.40$1.60
Results tracked1532

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Qwen3.5 Plus: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusQwen3.7 Plus
FrontierCode—10.2%
SciCode—45.5%
LMArena Coding—1473
ALE-Bench621.92—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen3.5 Plus: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusQwen3.7 Plus
OSWorld 2.0—2.8%
Vending-Bench 20.54—

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.8 (#74), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusQwen3.7 Plus
Chess Puzzles22%24%
Mystery Game Puzzles17%17%
DTBench80.5%84%
LMCA36.4%37.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index146.78147.37
NYT Connections (extended)—74.8%
CritPt—9.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1460

Math Too close to call

Qwen3.5 Plus: 49.6 (#61), Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusQwen3.7 Plus
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202586.7%93.3%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—34.4%
LMArena Math—1466
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)21%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#83), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusQwen3.7 Plus
GPQA Diamond84.8%87.9%
SimpleQA Verified25.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate10.7%—
LMArena Expert—1467

Multimodal Not comparable

Qwen3.5 Plus: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision—1279
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen3.5 Plus: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Non-English—1445
LMArena Chinese—1510
LMArena French—1473
LMArena German—1471
LMArena Japanese—1413
LMArena Korean—1415
LMArena Russian—1457
LMArena Spanish—1457

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen3.5 Plus: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following—1440

Long Context Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen3.5 Plus: 43.0 (#113), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusQwen3.7 Plus
CL-bench19.8%—
CL-bench Life12.4%—
LMArena Longer Query—1455

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen3.5 Plus: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text—1455
LMArena Creative Writing—1439
LMArena Multi-Turn—1460

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.5 Plus better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 Plus or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 Plus lists at $0.40 and $2.40.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1M tokens.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3.5 Plus and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.5 Plus has 15 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper