Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.7 to 42.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 66.1 to 59.7.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.3 | 44.7 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 41.5 (#112), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 43.4 (#79)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1430 | 1488 |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 28.1 (#93), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 29.6 (#81)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1427 | 1483 |
Math Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 36.1 (#130), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 37.3 (#99)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1418 | 1473 |
Knowledge Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.6 (#133), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.1 (#104)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1409 | 1489 |
Multilingual Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.7 (#103), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.4 (#21)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1399 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1440 | 1534 |
| LMArena Russian | 1397 | 1472 |
| LMArena French | — | 1483 |
| LMArena German | — | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1497 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1438 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1470 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.4 (#117), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.2 (#28)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | 1467 |
Long Context Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#120), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#44)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1391 | 1477 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.7 (#104), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.1 (#39)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | 1471 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1351 | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1409 | 1478 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.7 to 42.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?
Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 41.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.