Model comparison
o3-pro vs Qwen Turbo
o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Turbo costs 400× less per token, which makes it the better buy when o3-pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where o3-pro leads 29.5 to 22.2.
- Qwen Turbo is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $20 / $80 for o3-pro.
- Qwen Turbo accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 200K.
Side by side
| o3-pro | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 27.1 |
| Released | 2025-06-10 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | 1M |
| Max output | 100K | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $20 | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $80 | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
o3-pro: 55.5 (#24), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 84.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 58.2% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
o3-pro: 23.8 (#171), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.9% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 72.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 59.3% | — |
| DTBench | 86.9% | — |
| LMCA | 38.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 147.42 | — |
Math Not comparable
o3-pro: —, Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |
Knowledge o3-pro leads
o3-pro: 29.5 (#238), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.8% |
| Confabulations | 14.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 23.3% | — |
Long Context Not comparable
o3-pro: 72.2 (#1), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 97.2% | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
o3-pro: 57.1 (#133), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 84.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is o3-pro better than Qwen Turbo?
o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Turbo costs 400× less per token, which makes it the better buy when o3-pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, o3-pro or Qwen Turbo?
Qwen Turbo is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; o3-pro lists at $20 and $80.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen Turbo does, with 1M tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks do o3-pro and Qwen Turbo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. o3-pro has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.