Model comparison
o3-pro vs Qwen3-1.7B
o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where o3-pro leads 29.5 to 19.6.
- Qwen3-1.7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| o3-pro | Qwen3-1.7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 26.6 |
| Released | 2025-06-10 | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 100K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $20 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $80 | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 4 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
o3-pro: 55.5 (#24), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 84.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 58.2% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
o3-pro: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.4% |
Reasoning o3-pro leads
o3-pro: 23.8 (#171), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.9% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 72.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 59.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| DTBench | 86.9% | — |
| LMCA | 38.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 147.42 | — |
Math Not comparable
o3-pro: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.1% |
Knowledge o3-pro leads
o3-pro: 29.5 (#238), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 38% |
| Confabulations | 14.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 23.3% | — |
Long Context Not comparable
o3-pro: 72.2 (#1), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 97.2% | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
o3-pro: 57.1 (#133), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 84.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is o3-pro better than Qwen3-1.7B?
o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do o3-pro and Qwen3-1.7B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. o3-pro has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.