Model comparison
o3-mini vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
o3-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. o3-mini scores higher in 6 categories and OLMo 2 Furious 13B in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where o3-mini leads 38.3 to 18.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Reasoning: 89.6% for o3-mini and 16.3% for OLMo 2 Furious 13B.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| o3-mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2024-12-20 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 100K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4.40 | — |
| Results tracked | 51 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o3-mini leads
o3-mini: 40.8 (#132), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | o3-mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 82.7% | 10.4% |
| Aider Polyglot | 60.4% | — |
| SciCode | 39.8% | — |
| GSO | 1.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 43.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1378 | — |
| CadEval | 54% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
o3-mini: 29.6 (#84), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | o3-mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 22.5% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
o3-mini: 16.3 (#305), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | o3-mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 89.6% | 16.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 70.6% | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | 75.9% | 22.1% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 22.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 34.5% | — |
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 17% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1366 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 7% | — |
| DTBench | 68.8% | — |
| LMCA | 19% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 140.34 | — |
| ForecastBench | 59.6 | — |
Math o3-mini leads
o3-mini: 28.1 (#244), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | o3-mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 77.3% | 13.6% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 18.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 76.9% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1396 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 96.5% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 12.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
Knowledge o3-mini leads
o3-mini: 38.3 (#146), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | o3-mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 77% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 15.3% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| Confabulations | 17.9% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1364 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
o3-mini: 45.7 (#164), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | o3-mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1319 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1379 | — |
| LMArena French | 1334 | — |
| LMArena German | 1303 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1286 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1304 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1321 | — |
Instruction Following o3-mini leads
o3-mini: 75.1 (#72), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | o3-mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 84.4% | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1337 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
o3-mini: 33.8 (#256), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | o3-mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 50% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1343 | — |
Writing & Preference o3-mini leads
o3-mini: 50.3 (#182), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | o3-mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 50.7% | 11.2% |
| LMArena Text | 1337 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1286 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 61.7% | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1320 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is o3-mini better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
o3-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is o3-mini or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
o3-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do o3-mini and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
7 benchmarks have published results for both models. o3-mini has 51 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.