Model comparison
o3-mini vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
o3-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where o3-mini leads 29.6 to 18.6.
- o3-mini is cheaper at $1.10 / $4.40 per million input/output tokens, against $2.80 / $8.40 for Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct.
- o3-mini accepts more context: 200K tokens versus 131K.
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| o3-mini | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 29.9 |
| Released | 2024-12-20 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 200K | 131K |
| Max output | 100K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.10 | $2.80 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4.40 | $8.40 |
| Results tracked | 51 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
o3-mini: 40.8 (#132), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | o3-mini | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 60.4% | — |
| SciCode | 39.8% | — |
| GSO | 1.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 43.7% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 82.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1378 | — |
| CadEval | 54% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use o3-mini leads
o3-mini: 29.6 (#84), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 18.6 (#144)
Reasoning Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct leads
o3-mini: 16.3 (#305), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 20.7 (#233)
| Benchmark | o3-mini | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 22.8% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 36% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 34.5% | — |
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 17% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 89.6% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1366 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 7% | — |
| DTBench | 68.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 70.6% | — |
| LMCA | 19% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 140.34 | — |
| ForecastBench | 59.6 | — |
| LiveBench | 75.9% | — |
Math Not comparable
o3-mini: 28.1 (#244), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | o3-mini | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 18.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 76.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 77.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1396 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 96.5% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 12.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
o3-mini: 38.3 (#146), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | o3-mini | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 77% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 15.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 17.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1364 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
o3-mini: —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 33.5 (#97)
| Benchmark | o3-mini | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1107 |
| Video-MME | — | 73.5% |
| GeoBench | — | 62% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 33.3% |
Multilingual Not comparable
o3-mini: 45.7 (#164), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | o3-mini | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1319 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1379 | — |
| LMArena French | 1334 | — |
| LMArena German | 1303 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1286 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1304 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1321 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
o3-mini: 75.1 (#72), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | o3-mini | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 84.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1337 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
o3-mini: 33.8 (#256), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | o3-mini | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 50% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1343 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
o3-mini: 50.3 (#182), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | o3-mini | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1337 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1286 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 61.7% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1320 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 50.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is o3-mini better than Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?
o3-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, o3-mini or Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?
o3-mini is cheaper. It lists at $1.10 per million input tokens and $4.40 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct lists at $2.80 and $8.40.
Which has the bigger context window?
o3-mini does, with 200K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do o3-mini and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. o3-mini has 51 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has 6.