Model comparison
o1 vs Wizardlm 13b
o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. o1 scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where o1 leads 55.6 to 30.5.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| o1 | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 40.9 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2024-09-12 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 100K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $60 | — |
| Results tracked | 52 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o1 leads
o1: 46.1 (#70), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | o1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1367 | 1035 |
| Aider Polyglot | 61.7% | — |
| WeirdML | 47.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 69.7% | — |
| CadEval | 56% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 89% | — |
| MBPP+ | 80.2% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
o1: 24.6 (#117), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | o1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 10% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 51.1% | — |
Reasoning o1 leads
o1: 27.9 (#111), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | o1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1371 | 1018 |
| SimpleBench | 41.7% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 30.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 15% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 5.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 91.6% | — |
| DTBench | 74.7% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65.5% | — |
| LMCA | 22.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.91 | — |
| LiveBench | 75.7% | — |
Math o1 leads
o1: 36.1 (#175), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | o1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1388 | 1017 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 14.7% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 73.3% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 80.3% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 94.7% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 9.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
o1: 41.5 (#110), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | o1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 76.8% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 41.1% | — |
| Confabulations | 11.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1361 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
o1: 34.2 (#93), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | o1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1168 | — |
| GeoBench | 80% | — |
| VPCT | 37% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 41.4% | — |
Multilingual o1 leads
o1: 48.6 (#142), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | o1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1358 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1394 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1344 | — |
| LMArena German | 1337 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1346 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1396 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1356 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1345 | — |
Instruction Following o1 leads
o1: 74.8 (#86), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | o1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1367 | 1048 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 81.5% | — |
Long Context o1 leads
o1: 50.3 (#9), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | o1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1378 | 1054 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 83.3% | — |
Writing & Preference o1 leads
o1: 55.6 (#144), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | o1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1366 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1348 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1369 | 1047 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 70.2% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 65.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is o1 better than Wizardlm 13b?
o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is o1 or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
o1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.1 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do o1 and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. o1 has 52 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.