Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Opus 4.1 vs Wizardlm 13b

Claude Opus 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.0 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4.1 Anthropic

41.0

Rank #142 Confirmed

Wizardlm 13b Microsoft

31.4

Rank #274 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4.1 scores higher in 6 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Claude Opus 4.1 leads 62.4 to 30.5.
  • Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Opus 4.1Wizardlm 13b
ProviderAnthropicMicrosoft
Noometry Index41.031.4
Released2025-08-05—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K—
Max output32K—
Input $ / M tokens$15—
Output $ / M tokens$75—
Results tracked4810

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 44.4 (#73), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Coding14791035
SWE-bench Verified73.3%—
LMArena WebDev1390—
WeirdML45.9%—
ALE-Bench674.77—
AlgoTune1.34—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.1: 35.0 (#41), Wizardlm 13b: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Wizardlm 13b
Terminal-Bench38%—
GDPval43.6%—
Cybench42%—
DeepResearch Bench48.3%—
LMArena Search1148—
METR Time Horizons66.8%—

Reasoning Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 32.2 (#76), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Hard Prompts14431018
SimpleBench60%—
Chess Puzzles7%—
EnigmaEval7.2%—
EBR-Bench7.9%—
Mystery Game Puzzles21%—
DTBench80%—
LMCA37.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index144.12—
ForecastBench62—

Math Wizardlm 13b leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 22.3 (#277), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Math14311017
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)12.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 42.4%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202568.9%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)7.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)4.2%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.1: 42.0 (#101), Wizardlm 13b: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Wizardlm 13b
GPQA Diamond77.3%—
Humanity's Last Exam11.5%—
Confabulations17.1%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate11.8%—
LMArena Expert1439—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.1: 26.8 (#119), Wizardlm 13b: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Wizardlm 13b
VPCT35%—

Multilingual Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 52.0 (#95), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Non-English14051034
LMArena Chinese14271023
LMArena French1431—
LMArena German1413—
LMArena Japanese1378—
LMArena Korean1380—
LMArena Russian1422—
LMArena Spanish1448—

Instruction Following Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 75.6 (#58), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Instruction Following14351048

Long Context Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 44.5 (#63), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Longer Query14551054

Writing & Preference Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 62.4 (#74), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Text14191077
LMArena Creative Writing14121091
LMArena Multi-Turn14441047
Short-Story Creative Writing84.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 4.1 better than Wizardlm 13b?

Claude Opus 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.0 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Opus 4.1 or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Claude Opus 4.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.4 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4.1 and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4.1 has 48 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper