Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Wizardlm 13b

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google

40.8

Rank #144 Confirmed

Wizardlm 13b Microsoft

31.4

Rank #274 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads 60.9 to 30.5.
  • Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteWizardlm 13b
ProviderGoogleMicrosoft
Noometry Index40.831.4
Released2026-03-03—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.25—
Output $ / M tokens$1.50—
Results tracked3810

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.8 (#188), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteWizardlm 13b
LMArena Coding14001035
LMArena WebDev1256—
SciCode41.9%—
WeirdML52.2%—
ALE-Bench797.73—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 30.2 (#79), Wizardlm 13b: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteWizardlm 13b
DeepResearch Bench37.3%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.9 (#186), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteWizardlm 13b
LMArena Hard Prompts14071018
Kagi LLM Benchmark67.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)8.2%—
CritPt1.1%—
Chess Puzzles25%—
EnigmaEval3%—
Thematic Generalization63.3%—
DTBench76.8%—
LMCA35%—
Epoch Capabilities Index144.47—
ForecastBench54.4—

Math Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 40.7 (#90), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteWizardlm 13b
LMArena Math14281017
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)27.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202580%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.9 (#104), Wizardlm 13b: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteWizardlm 13b
GPQA Diamond81.8%—
Humanity's Last Exam8.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate8.2%—
LMArena Expert1398—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.4 (#60), Wizardlm 13b: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteWizardlm 13b
LMArena Vision1240—

Multilingual Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.3 (#86), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteWizardlm 13b
LMArena Non-English14111034
LMArena Chinese14611023
LMArena French1424—
LMArena German1429—
LMArena Japanese1413—
LMArena Korean1392—
LMArena Russian1420—
LMArena Spanish1421—

Instruction Following Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.7 (#131), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteWizardlm 13b
LMArena Instruction Following13771048

Long Context Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#122), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteWizardlm 13b
LMArena Longer Query13941054

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 60.9 (#94), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteWizardlm 13b
LMArena Text14161077
LMArena Creative Writing14011091
LMArena Multi-Turn14171047

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than Wizardlm 13b?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper