Model comparison
o1 vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. o1 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where o1 leads 50.3 to 39.2.
Side by side
| o1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 40.9 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2024-09-12 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 100K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $60 | — |
| Results tracked | 52 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o1 leads
o1: 46.1 (#70), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | o1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1367 | 1314 |
| Aider Polyglot | 61.7% | — |
| WeirdML | 47.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 69.7% | — |
| CadEval | 56% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 89% | — |
| MBPP+ | 80.2% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
o1: 24.6 (#117), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —
| Benchmark | o1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 10% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 51.1% | — |
Reasoning o1 leads
o1: 27.9 (#111), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | o1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1371 | 1299 |
| SimpleBench | 41.7% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 30.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 15% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 5.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 91.6% | — |
| DTBench | 74.7% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65.5% | — |
| LMCA | 22.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.91 | — |
| LiveBench | 75.7% | — |
Math Too close to call
o1: 36.1 (#175), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | o1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1388 | 1298 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 14.7% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 73.3% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 80.3% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 94.7% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 9.3% | — |
Knowledge o1 leads
o1: 41.5 (#110), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | o1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1361 | 1289 |
| GPQA Diamond | 76.8% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 41.1% | — |
| Confabulations | 11.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
o1: 34.2 (#93), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —
| Benchmark | o1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1168 | — |
| GeoBench | 80% | — |
| VPCT | 37% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 41.4% | — |
Multilingual o1 leads
o1: 48.6 (#142), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | o1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1358 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1394 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1337 | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1346 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1356 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1344 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1396 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1345 | — |
Instruction Following o1 leads
o1: 74.8 (#86), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | o1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1367 | 1275 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 81.5% | — |
Long Context o1 leads
o1: 50.3 (#9), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | o1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1378 | 1292 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 83.3% | — |
Writing & Preference o1 leads
o1: 55.6 (#144), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | o1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1366 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1348 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1369 | 1299 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 70.2% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 65.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is o1 better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is o1 or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
o1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.1 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do o1 and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. o1 has 52 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.