Model comparison
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads 60.9 to 49.4.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 40.8 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2026-03-03 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.25 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 38 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.8 (#188), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1400 | 1314 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1256 | — |
| SciCode | 41.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 52.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 797.73 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 30.2 (#79), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| DeepResearch Bench | 37.3% | — |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.9 (#186), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1407 | 1299 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 67.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 8.2% | — |
| CritPt | 1.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 25% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 63.3% | — |
| DTBench | 76.8% | — |
| LMCA | 35% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.47 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.4 | — |
Math Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 40.7 (#90), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1428 | 1298 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 27.7% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 80% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.9 (#104), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1398 | 1289 |
| GPQA Diamond | 81.8% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.4 (#60), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1240 | — |
Multilingual Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.3 (#86), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1411 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1461 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1429 | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1413 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1420 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1424 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1421 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.7 (#131), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1377 | 1275 |
Long Context Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#122), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1394 | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 60.9 (#94), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1416 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1417 | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (37.8 vs 38.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.