Model comparison

o1-pro vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

o1-pro OpenAI

31.2

Rank #264 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads 35.0 to 29.3.
  • Olmo 3.1 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

o1-pro and Olmo 3.1 32b Think specifications
o1-proOlmo 3.1 32b Think
ProviderOpenAIAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index31.237.3
Released2025-03-19—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K—
Max output100K—
Input $ / M tokens$150—
Output $ / M tokens$600—
Results tracked315

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

o1-pro: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.1 (#186)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmarko1-proOlmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Coding—1292

Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads

o1-pro: 20.2 (#223), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 24.1 (#151)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmarko1-proOlmo 3.1 32b Think
ARC-AGI-123.3%—
EnigmaEval6.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1272

Math Not comparable

o1-pro: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 33.6 (#170)

Math benchmarks
Benchmarko1-proOlmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Math—1305

Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads

o1-pro: 29.3 (#227), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.0 (#178)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmarko1-proOlmo 3.1 32b Think
Humanity's Last Exam8.1%—
LMArena Expert—1294

Multilingual Not comparable

o1-pro: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.3 (#226)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmarko1-proOlmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Non-English—1210
LMArena Chinese—1241
LMArena French—1262
LMArena German—1260
LMArena Russian—1193
LMArena Spanish—1288

Instruction Following Not comparable

o1-pro: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.8 (#213)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmarko1-proOlmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Instruction Following—1246

Long Context Not comparable

o1-pro: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#190)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmarko1-proOlmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Longer Query—1272

Writing & Preference Not comparable

o1-pro: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.4 (#215)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmarko1-proOlmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Text—1271
LMArena Creative Writing—1226
LMArena Multi-Turn—1252

Frequently asked questions

Is o1-pro better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do o1-pro and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. o1-pro has 3 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper