Noometry

Model comparison

Amazon Nova Lite vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Amazon Nova Lite Amazon

31.9

Rank #265 Confirmed

Olmo 3.1 32b Think Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)

37.9

Rank #191 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Lite scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads 35.7 to 26.3.
  • Olmo 3.1 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova LiteOlmo 3.1 32b Think
ProviderAmazonAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index31.937.9
Released2024-12-03—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window300K—
Max output10K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.06—
Output $ / M tokens$0.24—
Results tracked3415

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 32.5 (#270), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteOlmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Coding12391291
LiveBench Coding27.5%—
ALE-Bench236.25—

Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 19.3 (#260), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteOlmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Hard Prompts12201272
LiveBench Reasoning36.7%—
LiveBench Data Analysis37.2%—
LiveBench36.4%—

Math Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 27.8 (#247), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteOlmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Math12271305
Omni-MATH23.3%—
LiveBench Math36.7%—

Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 26.3 (#259), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteOlmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Expert12011295
Humanity's Last Exam3.6%—
MMLU-Pro60%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.1%—
GPQA (HELM)39.7%—
MMLU77%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Amazon Nova Lite: 25.5 (#123), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —

BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteOlmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Vision990—

Multilingual Too close to call

Amazon Nova Lite: 38.0 (#232), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteOlmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Non-English12081209
LMArena Chinese12251242
LMArena French12371260
LMArena German12291262
LMArena Russian12161193
LMArena Spanish12261289
LMArena Japanese1153—
LMArena Korean1153—

Instruction Following Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 59.3 (#255), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteOlmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Instruction Following12051247
LiveBench Instruction Following54.1%—
IFEval77.6%—

Long Context Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 37.4 (#217), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteOlmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Longer Query12341272

Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 42.1 (#237), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteOlmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Text12291272
LMArena Creative Writing11971226
LMArena Multi-Turn11991252
WildBench75%—
LiveBench Language25.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Lite better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Lite or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 32.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Lite and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Lite has 34 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper